00:00
00:00
nonfer

houston

Joined on 12/18/18

Level:
17
Exp Points:
2,989 / 3,210
Exp Rank:
19,443
Vote Power:
5.89 votes
Rank:
Civilian
Global Rank:
> 100,000
Blams:
0
Saves:
18
B/P Bonus:
0%
Whistle:
Normal
Medals:
1,669

app gone

Posted by nonfer - August 4th, 2023


iu_1041915_7201757.png


not the first time i've tried using tumblr's app.


iu_1041916_7201757.webp


doesn't really impress me enough to keep on my phone. when you don't pay people to code it shouldn't be surprising when the coding doesn't improve. going to have to find a replacement for tumblr sometime soon. don't really care if they or what they. already tried over-blog, wordpress, and medium.


iu_1041917_7201757.webp

gfs minute


recently tried the following browser calculators:

tuneform.com/tools/time-tempo-bpm-to-milliseconds-ms

&

www.unitsconverters.com/en/Bpm-To-Hz/Utu-6019-3681


was getting started on:


iu_1041918_7201757.webp


index


https://www.tumblr.com/vodkaonthelawn/724428632473354240/every-word-that-you-0119-1066


iu_1042014_7201757.webp


iu_1042169_7201757.png


"- informed discussions of why this material either should or shouldn't work."



may view bonded electron pairs as only slightly less hypothetical than proton decay. unlike the demise of a gravitational mass superconductivity has been provably observed. don't know why i find either conjecture so upsetting. charges smaller than electrons would make easier sense for a hypothesis as to why superconductivity could happen. it would explain why a surfeit of heat, current, or an interfering magnetic field would cause hysteresis. it would also make sense that charges smaller than one electron's worth could fail to find resistance. still just hypothetical because the tools to determine the current of superconductors measure the magnetic field they generate as electricity passes through without resistance. from what i've seen the tools to determine the exact properties and nature of that current aren't yet avallable.


iu_1042339_7201757.webp


friend of mine explained to me once: you're not actually on the internet if you're using dial-up. this was sometime in the mid to late nineties. he put it this way: you're living next to a house that has internet access and looking out your window at someone that has an internet connection. kept using dial up. that didn't make him wrong.

the new york times and tumblr aren't on the internet. at best they are internet adjacent. the new york times, tumblr, twitter, and facebook are all internet adjacent. they could be on the internet. they're just not.


iu_1054236_7201757.webp


thought about naming a song "internet adjacent". also thought about naming one "not internet adjacent". pass.

iu_1042655_7201757.png

didn't like this app either time i tried it. uninstalled fine.